Monday, October 15, 2012
Horror Fest Special: The Saw Series (First Cycle)
As some of you know, the Cap'n has never been what you would call the biggest fan on the Saw films. In fact, I aggressively avoided most of the sequels when they played in theatres and, for quite a while, when they hit DVD / Blu-Ray. I watched the first film, which was bloody but not very good, and then the second film, which was just not very good, and called it a day. I'd read the spoilers for the subsequent films and listen to friends cackle at how ridiculous the series' mythology became, but like the Paranormal Activity movies, I didn't feel and overwhelming desire to watch them myself.
Then, because I was working on "What the Hell" week, designed to see movies I'd never otherwise watch, Saw VII landed in my lap. I thought it might be fun to watch the "last" movie in the saga completely out of context, and it turned out that I didn't really need to be up to date to follow what turns out to be a fairly generic concept in sequel production. While I don't necessarily regret having seen it, I did realize that Saw as a franchise didn't have much going for it.
Still, it made the Cap'n wonder how the degree of absurd retconning to the story of Jigsaw happened, where the hell Mark Hoffman came from, and what other stupid plot twists I missed in the intervening chapters, so I watched Saw III, IV, V, and VI (the latter three in the span of two days), and I thought I'd share my findings with you.
Today we'll start with the "first cycle" of Saw films, the ones where Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) is the direct antagonist, and later this week we'll take a look at the "second cycle" where the original Jigsaw is replaced by Lt. Mark Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) and the films become increasingly erratic in their attempts to bridge the characters together.
To be honest, in retrospect, Saw isn't that great of a movie, but it masks its low budget and bad acting by keeping the clock ticking as Tapp and Sing try to find Dr. Lawrence Gordon (Cary Elwes) and Adam Faulkner-Sandheight (Leigh Whannel), who we are simultaneously following as they make sense of their situation. Chained in a dilapidated bathroom with a pair of saws and two tape recorders, and a bloodied body between them, Lawrence and Adam don't necessarily understand why they have to play Jigsaw's game. Through selective reveals of information, the audience is unaware of the connection between the two, or how either one of them might be involved with John Kramer (who we discover at the end of the film is not only the Jigsaw killer, but is also the "body" lying between Gordon and Faulkner when he stands up and leaves them for dead. SPOILER.)
Most of the film we're led to believe that Zep (Lost's Michael Emerson) is Jigsaw, until we discover he too has a tape from the real mastermind and is also following directions. What we don't know is how reliant the Saw films are going to be on scenes of screaming victims who waste most of their time yelling and not trying to stay alive or paying attention, but we'll find out soon enough...
Anyway, knowing what I know now about how the rest of the series copies the worst parts of the first film (the "twist" with flashbacks, the hysterical overacting, the over-reliance on gore to cover up for lack of story logic, and persistent misdirection), I guess that Saw does the best job of it, in that we don't immediately know what's going to happen when the film starts, unlike Saw II.
I will give Saw II credit for having a twist built around our expectations of the same parallel story-telling from the first film - the twist that the "game" isn't happening live, but is instead recorded footage, isn't as good as "the killer was in the room the whole time," but it does at least provide a better "bait and switch" than later chapters can offer. Tobin Bell is front and center as Kramer / Jigsaw, and he helps temper the grating performance by Wahlberg, who is so one-dimensionally stupid that I'm honestly amazed he has the good sense to do what Dr. Gordon didn't think of at the beginning of Saw III. Speaking of which, I guess the revelation that the "game" is happening in the same building where the first film took place is an okay idea, but now that the police are aware that it exists I find it really hard to believe Saw VII can end the way it does.
The victims are mostly one dimensional, behave like morons, and die accordingly. I can't honestly say that I would behave in a wholly rational way if I found myself in their situation, but the persistently idiotic behavior, even after they've clearly had time to digest their dilemma, smacks of lazy writing. Instead of "how would they react knowing what they know" the general behavior of every character in one of Jigsaw's traps is to "forget everything you just witnessed and immediately do the dumbest possible thing before being killed."
Oh, then there's the other "twist," which helps explain how a guy with cancer can set up such elaborate traps: Amanda is Jigsaw's accomplice (well, one of them. Let's just say that it doesn't explain it well enough, necessitating Hoffman's ridiculous involvement over the last four films). Eric Matthews is knocked out after dragging Kramer to the house (the last one on the left), and he awakens to find Amanda locking him in the same bathroom from the first film. Cue credits.
Meanwhile, Jeff (Angus McFayden) is playing one of Jigsaw's games, the one that Lynn must keep John alive for, and as usual there are twists about how the two protagonists are connected, and there's perfunctory gore with a victim opening the film and someone drowns in pig guts. At the end, Lynn dies, but not before killing Amanda and Jigsaw, and then something really stupid happens. Oh wait, that's the first example of how the series begins to desperately connect the post-Tobin Bell as Jigsaw with the Mark Hoffman as Jigsaw eras, which brings us to the second cycle, which we'll deal with next time...
For the Second Cycle, click here.