The Cap'n is going to keep this very brief because a) I haven't seen
Scott Pilgrim vs. The World*, and b) I've already spent the better part of Thursday reading blogs, Facebook posts, internet analysts, and reviewers get into why it doesn't matter that
Scott Pilgrim made 10.5 million dollars in its opening weekend, because
The Expendables will be forgotten and isn't any good blah blah blah.
Everybody who reads this already knows how I feel about
The Expendables (in short: it's a good but not great movie that was entertaining and mostly achieved what it set out to do), and you've already seen how I
reacted to the dismissive or quasi-disappointed reviews. You also know that I frequently make
jokes about the way that
Box Office performance equates to the
quality of a film, and on occasion have stuck up for movies that I didn't feel like got a fair shake
**. So I get where people are coming from.
That being said, there is a very simple reason that
Scott Pilgrim vs. The World came in fifth last weekend (not third, which is how some people are framing it, as though
The Expendables and
Eat, Pray, Love were the only movies
Pilgrim came in behind.
The Other Guys and
Inception were third and fourth, respectively): the vocal contingent online didn't go see the movie. It's that simple. That could always change in the coming weeks (I mean,
Avatar didn't light the world up in its first weekend), but people didn't turn out to see the greatest movie this year (etc). Period.
And to be clear about something, this is not a movie where exposure was strictly online; until last Friday, TV viewers were bombarded with ads for
Scott Pilgrim vs. The World. At least three times during practically every show I watched last week (and that includes
Futurama,
Louie,
Sportscenter,
That Metal Show, and
Man vs. Food, so it's not strictly "geek"-centric) there was an ad for Scott Pilgrim. There was an 8-foot standee at the Regal 14 in Santa Fe, and posters everywhere. It's not like folks didn't know this movie was coming out August 13th. They simply chose not to see it.
Frankly, the Cap'n was surprised: I fully expected that when we went to see
The Expendables on Friday night that we'd be in the less crowded theatre. It sure seemed like every other person we saw in line was going to see
Scott Pilgrim, but I guess that wasn't the case.
I'm fine with people speaking out on
Scott Pilgrim's behalf. What I don't really like is people
shitting all over the competition (not necessarily the article in question, but the comments to be sure) because the movie "underperformed" - and believe me, the studio is looking at it that way, even if the fans aren't. I've lamented many a film in the past that "underperformed" -
Grindhouse,
MacGruber,
Crank: High Voltage, and
Serenity, but I try not to blame it the other movies (the glaring example is in the footnotes). I have, in the past, ribbed fans of
Watchmen and
Kick-Ass or lamented the (to me) inexplicable popularity of
Transformers and
Friday the 13th, but there's a simple rule that wins the day: if people don't go to see a movie, however good or "groundbreaking" it is, and it was marketed out the wazoo, people are going to ask "Why?"
Instead of being unhappy that
Scott Pilgrim vs. The World didn't "perform" as well as four other movies last weekend and accordingly bad-mouthing the other films (especially
The Expendables, which is its own punching bag for other reasons), do something about it. Go see the movie this weekend. Tell all of your friends and take them to see it. Look, the Cap'n HATED
Kick-Ass, and I may have relished a bit too much that nobody went to see it, but I openly admit that it has a devoted fan base of people who are buying it on DVD and Blu Ray, and I myself saw the light about
Drag Me to Hell and couldn't be happier that it found its audience on home video.
In short, it's time for some tough love: stop your whining and do something about it. If you think
Scott Pilgrim vs. The World is the best thing since sliced bread, mobilize your readers and excite your friends about the movie. Fans of
Avatar did it, so surely you can too. Just don't ask the Cap'n to join, because I think I'll be watching
Piranha 3-D this weekend, and I'm really not in the mood to hear about how that movie is "inferior" to
Scott Pilgrim if you don't get off of your asses and put your enthusiasm to good use.
p.s. Just so the Cap'n is not accused of simply "making this up," I refer you to a handful of post-mortems or reviews, including a discussion thread from referring to MTV's article, a much more reasonably disappointed reaction from someone who watched both films, the DVD release list page from Ain't It Cool News where Harry bemoans the success of Miley Cyrus' The Last Song compared to Scott Pilgrim, C.H.U.D.'s review and box-office take on Scott Pilgrim, and Vern's review of Scott Pilgrim vs. The World, which directly addresses Hitfix, Ain't It Cool News, and C.H.U.D. I also recommend you check out comments, forums, and talkback areas, including the Hitfix one listed above to see what the general fan reaction is.* I like Edgar Wright. I like everything I've seen Edgar Wright make, including Shaun of the Dead, Spaced, Hot Fuzz, "Don't", and the student film he made that's an extra on Hot Fuzz. Nothing about Scott Pilgrim makes me want to see the movie, despite the above sentence.
** For example, I gave the Zac Efron vehicle 17 Again some guff for beating out Crank: High Voltage, even though there's honestly no reason to be surprised that happened.