Showing posts with label Conjecture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Conjecture. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Cap'n Howdy's Best of 2013: Upstream Color


 I'm not sure that I could tell you what Upstream Color is about. Then again, I'm not sure that writer / director / co-star Shane Carruth necessarily wants me to be able to, or that there even is one clear reading to take away from the film. The first line of dialogue, spoken a few moments into the film is "keep trying until you find one," which might be the only hint for audiences searching to untangle the narrative and find what's beneath. It's up to you to decide what Upstream Color means to you, and that is as much or as little as there is.

 That's not meant to diminish Upstream Color, which is, in many ways, as dense as Carruth's debut, Primer - still one of the best and carefully thought out time travel movies you're likely to see. It's a movie that sticks with you, that digs into your subconscious, that beckons you to return and watch it again, to pick up pieces you missed the first or second or third time, and to keep trying. What you take away from Upstream Color might shift based on what you see that you didn't before, or the way you respond to a line of dialogue or an image. I've even considered not explaining what happens in the film - even in a rudimentary fashion - because part of the thrill of watching it for the first time is putting together the pieces as you go along, unsure of how they fit together.
 
 Upstream Color's narrative plays out like someone dropping a jigsaw puzzle onto the floor and sliding the disparate pieces around, only deciding where things need to be near the end. The events in the film are, at their core, cyclical until the very end, when the pattern is disrupted (that I won't necessarily say is a SPOILER, although there may be others littered throughout). Of course, you can start anywhere in the cycle, as Carruth is well aware, and still get to the same point, even if the audience isn't sure what part they came in on. In broad strokes, the film is about a drug manufactured by the grubs who live on a plant with blue petals. The diluted version of the drug can be made by simply pouring some soda through a strainer the grub is in, and the effects create a sort of tandem mind between the people who take it.

 For the dealer (Thiago Martins) - identified as "Thief" in the credits - that's not enough to make a living on, so every now and then he doses someone with an undiluted version: the entire grub. For our purposes, this victim is Kris (Amy Seimetz). The effects leave her highly susceptible to suggestion, and the Thief uses this to his advantage, asking her to take out loans and give him the money. But being easily suggested isn't the only issue with this drug. There are... side effects. Before he can abandon Kris to her own devices, he takes her to The Sampler (Andrew Sensenig), for reasons better left to be discovered. Later, Kris meets Jeff (Carruth), another lost soul trying to cope with a loss in his past, one that may or may not be related to the Thief and The Sampler...

 That's as much as I'm comfortable telling you about Upstream Color, and that's actually telling you a lot. I've described the first thirty minutes of the movie, which is concerned mostly with the methodical operation the Thief runs to brainwash Kris and take her money. Where the drug comes from, how it affects you after it runs its course, and what The Sampler does other than create music from sounds he makes in nature, I leave up to you to discover. It's worth warning you that people with a sensitivity towards animals might have trouble with a few scenes in Upstream Color, so much so that even though it isn't real, it's quite haunting. You should know that going in, and that in many ways it's directly linked to what the title of the film means.

 Is Upstream Color meant to be put together? That, I suspect, is up to the viewers drawn to it. If you've seen Primer, you know Carruth's approach to narrative is unorthodox - he operates in a non-linear fashion, even when not making a movie about time travel. Upstream Color makes sudden lurches forward, and sometimes backwards, without necessarily acknowledging the shift in time. Conversations begin in one place and end in another. Memory becomes scrambled and loses its subjective quality (this is most certainly a running theme of the second half of the film). One could argue that we're simply being presented disparate moments that aren't intended to be put together, which is not to dismiss the potency of what we're seeing - only that finding the underlying theme might not be the point. Upstream Color might simply be experiential storytelling, if you choose to watch it that way. For those who love to seek out riddles, to answer ellipses, there's plenty of that to dig into as well.

 Upstream Color makes an explicit connection to Thoreau's Walden, and it's continuously referenced throughout the film (it may be the only consistent through-line in the movie), although I cannot say with certainty its significance when you find out why it's important near the end of the film. There is something to be said for the longing of capturing a specific moment in time that haunts the characters in Upstream Color, and part of the film close to the end reminded me a bit of Chan-wook Park's Lady Vengeance, although the significance of the moment for the characters in each film is very different. I do feel, for the moment, that a sense of loss (of memory, feelings, and time) binds together the Thief's victims, and they are inexplicably drawn together. Some of the symbolism involving The Sampler and who and how he watches I'm still working on, but I have a friend who is quite enthusiastic to discuss this at greater length. If you choose to follow Carruth down the (very enticing) rabbit hole, you too will want to join us. We'll keep trying until we find a really good one.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

New and Notes for Saturday the 14th

Hello all. I'm sorry that I chose to sit out Friday the 13th; it's normally a prime opportunity to do something Vorhees-related, but after things went daffy with the Blow Out review from Thursday*, I wasn't in the mood to possibly post something and lose it. So no review for The Dungeon Masters, no review for Paths of Glory, and no Jason Vorhees related business for you.

As a consolation prize, I will share with you the trailer for Saturday the 14th, a movie I must admit I've never seen.



To be fair, I have seen Student Bodies, which isn't any good at all, but was released the same year. Student Bodies was a spoof of slasher flicks, and this seems to be more of a catch-all, Zucker/Abrams/Zucker style comedy. It has a 3.8 rating on IMDB, which is worse than Student Bodies' 5.4. That's really all I need to know.

---

Moving on, I've noticed that nearly every movie site I traffic has been covering this story, about Lars von Trier and Martin Scorsese teaming up for a Five Obstructions sequel/remake/challenge. People are very excited, as well they should be, but only half of them bother to mention that it sounds a LOT like this story from 2010, which was subsequently debunked by Scorsese. Most of the sources that do seem only to be paying attention to the "remake Taxi Driver" part and not the fact that the language of the first 2010 article linked also mentions The Five Obstructions.

When I read the new story (on the Guardian U.K.'s page, linked by Criterion), it sounded very familiar, but it's being reported as "Fact" this time, just one that's totally without a timetable, considering that Scorsese is either filming or has finished filming Hugo Cabret and is scheduled to make Silence after that. So it's fact, just with wild speculation about what Scorsese would be remaking.

Forgive me for being a stick in the mud, but since many of the sites listed (like Collider) admit there's no announcement or any details (let alone anything I could find from either director) to make this, *ahem*, official, why exactly is this being reported with more certainty than last years' rumor?

There are two differences between the stories: 1) the 2010 iteration came out of the Berlin Film Festival; the 2011 out of Cannes, and 2) the new rumor drops Taxi Driver, at least in most of the stories I've seen. That really seems to be it, and last year's rumor sank like a stone the next day. Again, to be the cynic: why should I believe it this time, even if the idea is admittedly tantalizing?

---

In other news... I have been finding more and more horror films that were lost in the shuffle - like Dr. Terror's House of Horrors, proper uncut versions of Braindead and The Vault of Horror, Willard, The Dunwich Horror, and Queen of Blood. I also tracked down some cheeseball Roger Corman cheapies and a proper (and nice) 1080p transfer of Night of the Living Dead (which, if you have the bandwith, can be streamed here).

I've also begun piecing together a trailer reel for Summer Fest, provided there is one**. If it happens, this should be a good one - not just movie-wise, but in what I'll be able to offer as in-between entertainment (not just Dr. Re-Animator this time!)

---

That's all for today; I'll be back tomorrow with a Trailer Sunday and hopefully back to normal with reviews coming soon. Until then!


* I'm really hoping that if you're looking at this in the future, you'll say "what went daffy with it - I see it right below this post?" but for now that's not the case, and I don't live in the future yet, I am merely becoming a part of the future.
** For reasons I can't get into now, I might simply be unable to find the time. Priorities, you see.