Since it is October, and since Cap'n Howdy's Blogorium could be described as "horror themed" in its layout, I guess I should make with the reviewing horror movies that won't be a part of our annual celebration in two weeks. Fortunately for you, dear readers, I have a shelf full of horror flicks waiting to be discussed. We'll start this semi-regular column with 1971's The House that Dripped Blood.
I've made no secret of my love for anthology films, specifically those coming from Amicus Productions, so it was a surprise to me to discover that I'd never gotten around to watching The House that Dripped Blood. It turns out that House
is a pretty good addition to their collection of supernaturally based
horror films. The cast is great, the direction is atmospheric, and most
of the stories work in context.
Like most anthology films, you get four stories with a bit of a wrap-around, and House that Dripped Blood
covers most of your horror bases: Spectral Killers, Vampires,
Witchcraft, and evil museums / shops of mystery. The stories, by Robert
Bloch (author of Psycho) are:
2. A recently retired
businessman (Peter Cushing) moves into the house, and while wandering
the nearby town, finds a wax museum of horrors. He becomes obsessed with
a figure of Salome that reminds him of a long lost love, and when a
visiting friend goes missing, the terrible secret of the museum comes to
3. A not-retired businessman (Christopher Lee)
and his daughter (Chloe Franks) come to the house to get away from the
city. When a tutor (Nyree Dawn Porter) begins to connect with the
distant and sheltered child, her true nature comes to light, with
4. An actor and horror-buff (Jon "The Third Doctor"
Pertwee) and his co-star (Ingrid Pitt) rent out the house while he's
filming Curse of the Bloodsucker. Convinced that his cape looks too
cheap, he visits the mysterious Theo Von Hartmann's shop and buys an
authentic vampire cape. Maybe a little too authentic, as he discovers
when he puts it on.
The wrap-around story involves a
detective (John Bennett) investigating the disappearance of Pertwee's
character. The owner of the house, Mr. Stoker (John Bryans) shares the
mysterious history of the tenants. When Inspector Holloway finally goes
to the house, he finds much more than he expected in the basement...
think the third and fourth stories were my favorite. Admittedly, the
Jon Pertwee story gets quite silly in the middle (especially when he
puts the cape on after midnight and reacts hammily to his fangs and...
flying), but it is salvaged by Holloway's visit, one that ties up the
The first story, about the writer and his
mad killer, suffers from a rushed ending, one that relies on you paying
attention to a last second development based on a character you just
met. The set up is wonderful, and most of the lingering architectural
shots and creepy ornaments does soften the weak ending.
the really trippy dream imagery in the second story, the ending just
doesn't make sense. Something happens to the wax figure that, if what
the owner says is true, would render it impossible to be fixed in time
for the last shot. The final image, on the other hand, is a pretty good
Despite the fact that the film (rated PG) is
virtually bloodless, there's plenty of atmosphere and suggested horrors
to raise a bit of a chill. This is more evident in the witchcraft story
with Christopher Lee, which relies entirely on suggestion for its
gruesome finale. The House that Dripped Blood isn't as gory as Tales from the Crypt or From Beyond the Grave, and it might come off as a little tame compared to what was to come. However, taken with the much earlier Dr. Terror's House of Horrors, I think House fits the Amicus m.o.
the title is a little misleading, because while the film is about four
tenants who died (separately) in the same house, at least two of the
stories really have nothing to do with house as evil. They attempt to
tie everything together with Stoker directly addressing the audience
(something that seemed strangely familiar, although I'm convinced I've
never seen this before), but if you're willing to put the misnomer of
the title aside, it's a fun little spookshow you could probably scare
children with - and not scar them permanently.